<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ironic T-Shirt</title>
	<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com</link>
	<description>An irreverent look at what passes for "Entertainment"; Pop culture that's already been popped.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on EW&#8217;s New Classics?  Hardly.  Part I:  The Movies by Diesel The</title>
		<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/06/27/ews-new-classics-hardly-part-i-the-movies/#comment-1499</link>
		<author>Diesel The</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 19:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/06/27/ews-new-classics-hardly-part-i-the-movies/#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>Yeah, we both did.  I think there's some backlash to that movie.  I've heard in some circles talk that it's the worst movie to ever win Best Picture.  Then again, I've also heard that about Crash, so who knows.  I actually enjoyed both of those upon first viewing.  Never went back for a second helping of either and I have no remorse over that.  But I suppose American Beauty at least deserves to be on the secondary list, if not the slam dunk list.  So for you, AJ, American Beauty has been added.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, we both did.  I think there&#8217;s some backlash to that movie.  I&#8217;ve heard in some circles talk that it&#8217;s the worst movie to ever win Best Picture.  Then again, I&#8217;ve also heard that about Crash, so who knows.  I actually enjoyed both of those upon first viewing.  Never went back for a second helping of either and I have no remorse over that.  But I suppose American Beauty at least deserves to be on the secondary list, if not the slam dunk list.  So for you, AJ, American Beauty has been added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EW&#8217;s New Classics?  Hardly.  Part I:  The Movies by AJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/06/27/ews-new-classics-hardly-part-i-the-movies/#comment-1447</link>
		<author>AJ</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/06/27/ews-new-classics-hardly-part-i-the-movies/#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>is it just me or did both you and EW omit american beauty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it just me or did both you and EW omit american beauty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Diary of an Entertainment Weekly Editor by Ironic T-Shirt &#187; EW&#8217;s New Classics? Hardly. Part I: The Movies</title>
		<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/05/02/diary-of-an-entertainment-weekly-editor/#comment-1314</link>
		<author>Ironic T-Shirt &#187; EW&#8217;s New Classics? Hardly. Part I: The Movies</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/05/02/diary-of-an-entertainment-weekly-editor/#comment-1314</guid>
		<description>[...] Entertainment Weekly decided to celebrate its 1000th issue with, shock of shocks, a series of lists commemorating the &#8220;new classics&#8221; in entertainment from the past 25 years. Also, shock [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Entertainment Weekly decided to celebrate its 1000th issue with, shock of shocks, a series of lists commemorating the &#8220;new classics&#8221; in entertainment from the past 25 years. Also, shock [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Jordanesque Ambre of Rock of Love 2 by kgator</title>
		<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/04/15/the-jordanesque-ambre-of-rock-of-love-2/#comment-1302</link>
		<author>kgator</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/04/15/the-jordanesque-ambre-of-rock-of-love-2/#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>bret need to go to daisy. Thats what hes use to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bret need to go to daisy. Thats what hes use to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Diary of an Entertainment Weekly Editor by brad laidman</title>
		<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/05/02/diary-of-an-entertainment-weekly-editor/#comment-1291</link>
		<author>brad laidman</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/05/02/diary-of-an-entertainment-weekly-editor/#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>Raise your hand if you could have written a better column about the new 90210 than Diablo Cody!

Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raise your hand if you could have written a better column about the new 90210 than Diablo Cody!</p>
<p>Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Jordanesque Ambre of Rock of Love 2 by Monica</title>
		<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/04/15/the-jordanesque-ambre-of-rock-of-love-2/#comment-1289</link>
		<author>Monica</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/04/15/the-jordanesque-ambre-of-rock-of-love-2/#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>Are you still with bret michaels. Yes or No I watch the show rock of love 2 and i think you and him are great together. 

thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you still with bret michaels. Yes or No I watch the show rock of love 2 and i think you and him are great together. </p>
<p>thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Doctor:  The Britney Spears Edition by Big D</title>
		<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/01/23/good-doctor-the-britney-spears-edition/#comment-856</link>
		<author>Big D</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2008/01/23/good-doctor-the-britney-spears-edition/#comment-856</guid>
		<description>This is simply brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is simply brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Balls, Nuts, or Testicles:  A Guide to Proper Usage by Ivan</title>
		<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2007/06/18/balls-nuts-or-testicles-a-guide-to-proper-usage/#comment-807</link>
		<author>Ivan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2007/06/18/balls-nuts-or-testicles-a-guide-to-proper-usage/#comment-807</guid>
		<description>Nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Balls, Nuts, or Testicles:  A Guide to Proper Usage by Ironic T-Shirt &#187; The Bachelor Guy » MILFs and Cougars: A Practical Guide</title>
		<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2007/06/18/balls-nuts-or-testicles-a-guide-to-proper-usage/#comment-742</link>
		<author>Ironic T-Shirt &#187; The Bachelor Guy » MILFs and Cougars: A Practical Guide</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2007/06/18/balls-nuts-or-testicles-a-guide-to-proper-usage/#comment-742</guid>
		<description>[...] Everything you need to know to tell the difference between a MILF and a Cougar.  Akin to our own Guide to Testicles, this thing lays it all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Everything you need to know to tell the difference between a MILF and a Cougar.  Akin to our own Guide to Testicles, this thing lays it all [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Balls, Nuts, or Testicles:  A Guide to Proper Usage by Georghios</title>
		<link>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2007/06/18/balls-nuts-or-testicles-a-guide-to-proper-usage/#comment-714</link>
		<author>Georghios</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.looselybasedfilms.com/2007/06/18/balls-nuts-or-testicles-a-guide-to-proper-usage/#comment-714</guid>
		<description>Interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
